Critically analyse the competing views articulated by Essay

Critically analyse the competing views articulated by capital-exporting countries and capital- importing countries in relation to the disposition of compensation for the expropriation of foreign property - Essay Exampleand other countries. Similarly, Mexico nationalised all American interests in 1938 and refused to pay compensation to the property owners. Their stand, as capital importing countries was that when they initiated economic and social reforms both the nationals and foreign entities suffered or enjoyed equally and hence, there was no question of compensation especially when they had no sources or means or capacity to compensate the parties. On the other hand, capital exporting countries insisted that they were entitled to minimum standard of manipulation which should not be just equal to the treatment given to the nationals. Many equitable principles have evolved in the process each of which has been fairly argued for and against. The capital importing countries held the view that when foreign entities enter into their asseverates they are hypothetical to merge their destiny along with nationals and work together for the countrys betterment and therefore cannot expect any better treatment than available to nationals. either these controversies had been due to absence of settled international law prior to world war period and during the immediate post war period. As a tooth root to the much vexed issue, bilateral and multilateral treaties have come to stay as contracts with legal binding to address similar situations during their operating periods.This paper proposes to try out the views of the capital exporting and capital importing countries in the matter of compensation payable for taking of the foreign investors (capital exporting) properties by the host states (capital importing). Since there is no enactment of international law as such, only by the customary law and equitable principles, it can be decided whether an expropriation resorted to by the host state is justifiable or not. With this perspective, this paper will examine the customary law and various instances of expropriations across the world and